What's the difference between Screencast-o-matic and Snagit?
Answered
I already have Screencast-O-Matic. What does Snagit have that Screencast-O-Matic doesn't?
Thanks.
-
Lots! This page of tutorials gives a good overview of Snagit capabilities.
But what is it you're wanting to do or make? That will help focus the answer on use cases and features relevant to you.
0 -
It's not so much what I intend to do as what the possibilities are. I currently use screencastomatic for simple screen recording for my online classes. I know that SnagIt is also screencasting software, but it's more expensive than screencastomatic. I'm wondering what justifies the extra cost. Perhaps there are some things I could do that I haven't even envisioned because I didn't know it was possible. I will view those tutorials, though, as that should give me an idea. I just thought there might be a side-by-side comparison chart or something like that I could look at. Thanks!
0 -
I am not familiar with screencast-o-matic, but based on its feature set it appears similar to Camtasia as opposed to Snag-it. Snag-it started first and foremost as a screen capture utility. Video was added as a feature later on. Camtasia is screen video recording only, and it is full featured in that regard. The price for Camtasia is significantly higher than for Snag-it. The one difference I see is that screencast-o-matic is subsciption based only. Both Snag-it and Camtasia offer both subscriptions as well as single cost licensing models. Snag-it single cost license for a version is actually not very expensive. The subscription model is pay forever, and it will cost more in the long run.
0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
3 comments